Re: Ain't it the truth?
Posted by: Heavy Harmonies ()
Date: November 03, 2006 01:50AM

I understand your point, DJ, but I think there are alternatives if the band/label does not want to give up a potential selling copy of the disc:

The per-unit manufacturing cost of a CD once you pass a certain minimum threshold (usually 500 or 1,000 depending on replicator) is minimal; at that point you're really talking about additional postage/packaging costs. For example, I do a data CD-ROM project annually that is done through DiscMakers, one of the more expensive replicators out there. For the specs on this project, a quantity of 500 discs costs $1,490. A quantity of 1,000 units is $1,590, only $100 additional for the extra 500 units. You're paying for all the setup and makeready charges in the first N units.

Of course, if we're talking international shipping, obviously you'd want to ship sans jewel cases to hold down shipping costs, so you'd have to unpackage the promo copies (although I've found that if you request the replicator to reserve a certain percentage unassembled and simply ship them as raw artwork and CDs along with the polywrapped retail copies, they're usually pretty accommodating).

Alternatively, if the band or label doesn't want to press promo copies, while I cannot speak for anyone else, for the purposes of my web site, a CD-R plus a URL to high-resolution artwork and band pictures works just fine.

I realize that for submission to traditional media outlets, a full polished, packaged product is most likely required for consideration, however I speculate that you'd find that most internet-based promo recipients would be fine with the stripped down approach.

I know that some will say "Why don't you just deal with mp3s online so there's no need to ship anything?" Again, this is a matter of personal preference, but I despise mp3s for truly evaluating music. Because of the variable nature of mp3 encoding, the final result may bear little resemblence to the actual release on CD. When it comes to production, mix, sonic characteristics, etc., mp3s simply do not suffice.



==============================
https://heavyharmonies.com - Over 21,000 AOR, melodic, and 80s hard rock CDs... and STILL growing!

Navigate: Previous MessageNext Message
Options: ReplyQuote


SubjectViewsWritten ByPosted
Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 257 Laurent 11/01/2006 05:46PM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 163 Alex 11/01/2006 06:27PM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 157 DJ Klaus 11/01/2006 07:33PM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 144 Nick 11/01/2006 08:10PM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 159 blm 11/01/2006 08:28PM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 208 Laurent 11/01/2006 09:09PM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 214 DCPete 11/01/2006 09:16PM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 187 Rob DeVore 11/02/2006 12:38AM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 163 Angelmilk 11/02/2006 01:03AM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 183 Chazz 11/02/2006 04:55AM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 157 pgn111 11/02/2006 06:23AM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 172 Niclas 11/02/2006 07:27AM
Posting on behalf of Lance King Nightmare Records 181 Nick 11/02/2006 07:34AM
Re: Posting on behalf of Lance King Nightmare Records 207 Niclas 11/02/2006 08:02AM
Re: Posting on behalf of Lance King Nightmare Records 149 Nick 11/02/2006 08:32AM
Re: Posting on behalf of Lance King Nightmare Records 178 Niclas 11/02/2006 02:35PM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 177 Andrew 11/02/2006 09:36AM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 185 Geoff Gillespie 11/02/2006 12:02PM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 174 Andrew 11/02/2006 06:55PM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 151 Russ 11/02/2006 07:21PM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 171 ARfm Studio 11/02/2006 08:29PM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 293 Birgitt 11/02/2006 09:54PM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 163 Paul Ryan 11/02/2006 10:15PM
Ain't it the truth? 194 Heavy Harmonies 11/03/2006 12:08AM
Re: Ain't it the truth? 164 DJ Klaus 11/03/2006 12:18AM
Re: Ain't it the truth? 148 Paul Ryan 11/03/2006 12:49AM
Re: Ain't it the truth? 190 DJ Klaus 11/03/2006 04:53AM
Re: Ain't it the truth?171 Heavy Harmonies 11/03/2006 01:50AM
Re: Ain't it the truth? 179 JJ 11/03/2006 02:04AM
Re: Ain't it the truth? 162 DJ Klaus 11/03/2006 05:23AM
Re: Ain't it the truth? 171 Nick 11/03/2006 01:22AM
Re: Ain't it the truth? 151 Heavy Harmonies 11/03/2006 02:03AM
Re: Ain't it the truth? 182 Chazz 11/03/2006 03:01AM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 168 Chazz 11/03/2006 02:59AM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 325 Laurent 11/02/2006 10:18PM
They don't have to.... 169 Meo 11/02/2006 11:20PM
Re: They don't have to.... 199 Mikos 11/02/2006 11:57PM
Re: They don't have to.... 192 Meo 11/03/2006 12:18AM
Re: They don't have to.... 152 Mikos 11/03/2006 12:50AM
Re: They don't have to.... 163 Meo 11/03/2006 01:42AM
Re: They don't have to.... 213 thinny 11/03/2006 03:09AM
Re: They don't have to.... 171 Mikos 11/03/2006 03:38AM
Re: They don't have to.... 191 ARfm Studio 11/03/2006 12:14AM
Re: They don't have to.... 163 Laurent 11/03/2006 12:38AM
Re: They don't have to.... 154 Meo 11/03/2006 01:45AM
Re: They don't have to.... 174 Mikos 11/03/2006 02:06AM
Re: They don't have to.... 189 Nick 11/03/2006 01:47AM
Re: They don't have to.... 243 Rob DeVore 11/03/2006 01:53AM
Re: They don't have to.... 178 Mikos 11/03/2006 03:41AM
Re: They don't have to.... 140 Paul Ryan 11/03/2006 09:10PM
Re: They don't have to.... 179 JJ 11/03/2006 10:12PM
Re: They don't have to.... 167 DCPete 11/03/2006 10:22PM
Re: Why do rock acts still rely on labels ? 165 Danny Danzi 11/03/2006 11:07PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Powered by Phorum.

Disclaimer: melodicrock.com takes no responsibility for the contents of messages posted on this open forum, or for the sanity of those posting.