Re: van halen
Posted by: Wardy ()
Date: May 06, 2014 10:38PM

I hope so.

Appreciate the overview deflep and I'm the first to admit after being SO against the Roth reunion record and the use of old material I did the quickest 180 of anyone once I got the ears around the records' magnificence ;) Being such a Can Hagar fan the only reason I even bothered was to hear Eddie (and respect to the great job jnr did, was super dark Mikey wasn't involved) so was pleasantly surprised to say the least.

But seriously, couldn't give a toss about the use of old stuff reckon the whole thing rocked and from memory it was about 50/50 anyways wasn't it?

While would do well not seeing that Roth shuffle again anytime again LOL would kill for another Roth fronted record and hope yer wrong in your concerns ;)

Navigate: Previous MessageNext Message
Options: ReplyQuote


SubjectViewsWritten ByPosted
van halen 709 deflep7 05/06/2014 05:11PM
Re: van halen 541 Andrew 05/06/2014 06:42PM
Re: van halen384 Wardy 05/06/2014 10:38PM
Re: van halen 358 Pelata 05/06/2014 10:27PM
Re: van halen 159 jason the buc 05/07/2014 03:04PM
Re: van halen 152 Troy 05/07/2014 03:13PM
Re: van halen 147 jason the buc 05/07/2014 03:18PM
Re: van halen 124 Troy 05/07/2014 06:07PM
Re: van halen 248 Ken 05/07/2014 02:39AM
Re: van halen 230 OzzMosiz 05/07/2014 03:48AM
Re: van halen 152 danrox 05/07/2014 11:07AM
Re: van halen 92 farrarsm 05/08/2014 04:01AM
Re: van halen 67 Troy 05/08/2014 04:53PM
Re: van halen 33 Brett5150 05/14/2014 01:32PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Powered by Phorum.

Disclaimer: melodicrock.com takes no responsibility for the contents of messages posted on this open forum, or for the sanity of those posting.