Re: Queensryche F.U. yet again...
Posted by: deflep7 ()
Date: June 23, 2013 08:17AM

it is getting good press and i wil buy it like i did tate's version...

as far as the name its a tough issue. like it or not tate's voice was queensryche and he wrote most of the songs , good or bad as it is it was him. so honestly based on contributions i would say he should have the name....

but like someone said above i think he should be solo and the other band is rising west..no more queensryche unless they reunite later on..which most likely wil happen...

Navigate: Previous MessageNext Message
Options: ReplyQuote


SubjectViewsWritten ByPosted
Queensryche F.U. yet again... 650 millcat 06/23/2013 05:00AM
Re: Queensryche F.U. yet again... 396 adolfo 06/23/2013 05:42AM
Re: Queensryche F.U. yet again... 348 deflep7 06/23/2013 06:52AM
Re: Queensryche F.U. yet again... 272 millcat 06/23/2013 07:07AM
Re: Queensryche F.U. yet again... 236 Purple 06/23/2013 07:49AM
Re: Queensryche F.U. yet again... 109 Terry K. 06/25/2013 01:05PM
Re: Queensryche F.U. yet again...243 deflep7 06/23/2013 08:17AM
Re: Queensryche F.U. yet again... 229 kidego71 06/23/2013 10:17AM
Re: Queensryche F.U. yet again... 195 Troy 06/23/2013 11:17AM
Re: Queensryche F.U. yet again... 185 jazze.pat 06/23/2013 12:42PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Powered by Phorum.

Disclaimer: melodicrock.com takes no responsibility for the contents of messages posted on this open forum, or for the sanity of those posting.