Re: Peter Criss question/comment
Posted by: Snake65 ()
Date: March 04, 2013 03:12AM

My thoughts are this. I think Gene was very hardcore in getting the band to be huge. Paul felt the same way so they did anything to get fans in the seats and fans to buy product. Ace and peter also felt that way but took the party to serious. Its one thing to party and its another not being able to function 100% for fans spending there money on you. When Peter came back I think it was clear he was somewhat sober while Ace was not. It should have been an even split on the money. Look at Bill Ward...same type of thing. Plus Doc Mcghee has a rep. I think Gene and Paul could have less dicky if Peter was honestly sober. If he was and they were like that then they are dicks.

PS: Still trying to find out if Peter signed that 25% away while in South Oaks

Navigate: Previous MessageNext Message
Options: ReplyQuote


SubjectViewsWritten ByPosted
Peter Criss question/comment 501 Snake65 03/03/2013 11:14PM
Re: Peter Criss question/comment 346 Laurent 03/04/2013 01:04AM
Re: Peter Criss question/comment 313 Snake65 03/04/2013 01:12AM
Re: Peter Criss question/comment 294 kingnoony 03/04/2013 01:13AM
Re: Peter Criss question/comment 272 Superfedz 03/04/2013 02:54AM
Re: Peter Criss question/comment257 Snake65 03/04/2013 03:12AM
Re: Peter Criss question/comment 228 IanF 03/04/2013 04:50AM
Re: Peter Criss question/comment 217 Snake65 03/04/2013 06:04AM
Re: Peter Criss question/comment 169 Scott Watson 03/04/2013 08:00PM
Re: Peter Criss question/comment 101 backwhereubelong 03/05/2013 07:40AM
Re: Peter Criss question/comment 68 Snake65 03/05/2013 10:14AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Powered by Phorum.

Disclaimer: melodicrock.com takes no responsibility for the contents of messages posted on this open forum, or for the sanity of those posting.