I've just remembered that he's (Dave Everley) the same reviewer that absolutely pissed all over Nickelback's last album and gave that one 2 / 10 as well, with similar smart arse assassinations littered throughout. I don't really know what the point of getting someone with an agenda to review an album is in all honesty. They don't really benefit anyone except the writer, who just gets an opportunity to be oh so clever and bilious. It would be just as bad to give the album to a slathering fan boy though. At least give it to someone who can be objective and give true fans something worth reading and worth considering.

----------------------------------------------------------


"In a flash of inspiration, you said of every living thing
We're the first in all creation, to live on the ground and sing"