Re: joe elliott comment
Posted by: Chazz ()
Date: January 25, 2013 06:09PM

Nice one Scott, I'm not exactly rushing out for DefLep songs either, but the format makes sense for the bands, if not the fans yet.

Maybe not so relevant in DefLeps case with their legacy, but the format of regular shorter releases keeps a smaller band in the public eye more regularly, which in these days of being a distant niche genre, means a more regular flow of sales income to re-use for recording the next 4 songs.

The mere cost of posting CDs to distributors is higher than the margin the band/label might make supplying them (even if postage is shared) and then there are all the advertising costs which run for perhaps 3-4 weeks and then in the present album format, nothing for another 12-18 months. If 4 songs are released 4-6 monthly, the gap that has to be re-gained is so much shorter, people are still playing the last 4 songs and looking out for more. Maintaining the inertia is much cheaper and more effective than building from scratch over long quiet periods.

Using the likes of I-Tunes, bands can build up an album worth of available material over a year, but just be able to budget the issuing of it so much easier. Labels can share the promo costs between 3-4 bands if they can schedule the releases at the same time. It makes sense



SubjectViewsWritten ByPosted
joe elliott comment 1065 deflep7 01/23/2013 07:40PM
Re: joe elliott comment 491 Scott Watson 01/23/2013 08:08PM
Re: joe elliott comment 442 Cressy 01/23/2013 08:22PM
Re: joe elliott comment 387 Peter M. Bietenholz 01/23/2013 09:16PM
Re: joe elliott comment 265 Chazz 01/24/2013 02:25AM
Re: joe elliott comment 198 Terry K. 01/24/2013 12:48PM
Re: joe elliott comment 164 Scott Watson 01/24/2013 07:58PM
Re: joe elliott comment133 Chazz 01/25/2013 06:09PM
Re: joe elliott comment 357 totobob 01/23/2013 09:16PM
Re: joe elliott comment 291 Vantheman 01/23/2013 10:33PM
Re: joe elliott comment 304 Ken 01/23/2013 10:40PM
Re: joe elliott comment 215 McMack 01/24/2013 03:48AM
Re: joe elliott comment 200 Ken 01/24/2013 07:39AM
Re: joe elliott comment 174 Terry K. 01/24/2013 12:57PM
Re: joe elliott comment 170 Daredevil 01/24/2013 06:54PM
Re: joe elliott comment 165 Scott Watson 01/24/2013 08:00PM
Re: joe elliott comment 268 frytzsdmf 01/23/2013 11:02PM
Re: joe elliott comment 261 MetalJedi 01/23/2013 11:55PM
Re: joe elliott comment 232 Pelata 01/24/2013 01:41AM
Re: joe elliott comment 219 Troy 01/24/2013 02:11AM
Re: joe elliott comment 212 Doug Wolfgang 01/24/2013 04:14AM
Re: joe elliott comment 232 mike1990 01/24/2013 05:14AM
Re: joe elliott comment 196 nobycane 01/24/2013 06:29AM
Re: joe elliott comment 199 Aussie Dave 01/24/2013 07:20AM
Re: joe elliott comment 183 Wardy 01/24/2013 09:54AM
Re: joe elliott comment 180 soldierofthenight 01/24/2013 11:01AM
Re: joe elliott comment 116 Wardy 01/25/2013 09:15AM
Re: joe elliott comment 191 Aussie Dave 01/24/2013 04:28PM
Re: The Cult and DL... 199 Wardy 01/24/2013 09:30PM
Re: The Cult and DL... 145 Aussie Dave 01/25/2013 07:34AM
Re: The Cult and DL... 124 Wardy 01/25/2013 09:10AM
Re: joe elliott comment 136 jazze.pat 01/25/2013 04:38PM
Re: joe elliott comment 193 Ross S. 01/24/2013 05:22PM
Re: joe elliott comment 187 Scott 01/24/2013 08:53PM
Re: joe elliott comment 131 OzzMosiz 01/25/2013 09:56PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Powered by Phorum.

Disclaimer: melodicrock.com takes no responsibility for the contents of messages posted on this open forum, or for the sanity of those posting.