Re: joe elliott comment
Posted by: Chazz ()
Date: January 25, 2013 06:09PM

Nice one Scott, I'm not exactly rushing out for DefLep songs either, but the format makes sense for the bands, if not the fans yet.

Maybe not so relevant in DefLeps case with their legacy, but the format of regular shorter releases keeps a smaller band in the public eye more regularly, which in these days of being a distant niche genre, means a more regular flow of sales income to re-use for recording the next 4 songs.

The mere cost of posting CDs to distributors is higher than the margin the band/label might make supplying them (even if postage is shared) and then there are all the advertising costs which run for perhaps 3-4 weeks and then in the present album format, nothing for another 12-18 months. If 4 songs are released 4-6 monthly, the gap that has to be re-gained is so much shorter, people are still playing the last 4 songs and looking out for more. Maintaining the inertia is much cheaper and more effective than building from scratch over long quiet periods.

Using the likes of I-Tunes, bands can build up an album worth of available material over a year, but just be able to budget the issuing of it so much easier. Labels can share the promo costs between 3-4 bands if they can schedule the releases at the same time. It makes sense



SubjectViewsWritten ByPosted
joe elliott comment 1164 deflep7 01/23/2013 07:40PM
Re: joe elliott comment 552 Scott Watson 01/23/2013 08:08PM
Re: joe elliott comment 498 Cressy 01/23/2013 08:22PM
Re: joe elliott comment 448 Peter M. Bietenholz 01/23/2013 09:16PM
Re: joe elliott comment 332 Chazz 01/24/2013 02:25AM
Re: joe elliott comment 260 Terry K. 01/24/2013 12:48PM
Re: joe elliott comment 230 Scott Watson 01/24/2013 07:58PM
Re: joe elliott comment191 Chazz 01/25/2013 06:09PM
Re: joe elliott comment 414 totobob 01/23/2013 09:16PM
Re: joe elliott comment 350 Vantheman 01/23/2013 10:33PM
Re: joe elliott comment 366 Ken 01/23/2013 10:40PM
Re: joe elliott comment 276 McMack 01/24/2013 03:48AM
Re: joe elliott comment 262 Ken 01/24/2013 07:39AM
Re: joe elliott comment 230 Terry K. 01/24/2013 12:57PM
Re: joe elliott comment 230 Daredevil 01/24/2013 06:54PM
Re: joe elliott comment 215 Scott Watson 01/24/2013 08:00PM
Re: joe elliott comment 338 frytzsdmf 01/23/2013 11:02PM
Re: joe elliott comment 329 MetalJedi 01/23/2013 11:55PM
Re: joe elliott comment 288 Pelata 01/24/2013 01:41AM
Re: joe elliott comment 278 Troy 01/24/2013 02:11AM
Re: joe elliott comment 269 Doug Wolfgang 01/24/2013 04:14AM
Re: joe elliott comment 294 mike1990 01/24/2013 05:14AM
Re: joe elliott comment 269 nobycane 01/24/2013 06:29AM
Re: joe elliott comment 263 Aussie Dave 01/24/2013 07:20AM
Re: joe elliott comment 250 Wardy 01/24/2013 09:54AM
Re: joe elliott comment 238 soldierofthenight 01/24/2013 11:01AM
Re: joe elliott comment 169 Wardy 01/25/2013 09:15AM
Re: joe elliott comment 250 Aussie Dave 01/24/2013 04:28PM
Re: The Cult and DL... 271 Wardy 01/24/2013 09:30PM
Re: The Cult and DL... 197 Aussie Dave 01/25/2013 07:34AM
Re: The Cult and DL... 179 Wardy 01/25/2013 09:10AM
Re: joe elliott comment 207 jazze.pat 01/25/2013 04:38PM
Re: joe elliott comment 258 Ross S. 01/24/2013 05:22PM
Re: joe elliott comment 242 Scott 01/24/2013 08:53PM
Re: joe elliott comment 178 OzzMosiz 01/25/2013 09:56PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Powered by Phorum.

Disclaimer: melodicrock.com takes no responsibility for the contents of messages posted on this open forum, or for the sanity of those posting.