Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful?
Posted by: Signal Fan ()
Date: January 11, 2013 12:25PM

My favorite Rough Cutt song is easily "Black Widow". While exploring the Cutt on Youtube, I came across some impressive clips from their Live In Japan concert. They were an excellent live band with a LOT of talent! No weak links in the group. Every one of those guys DELIVERED!!! I also like their cover of "Piece of My Heart.

Black Widow

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21PLoFOrQc0

Piece of My Heart

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27Fci256nx4

Navigate: Previous MessageNext Message
Options: ReplyQuote


SubjectViewsWritten ByPosted
Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 535 Laurent 01/10/2013 05:22PM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 301 Ydde 01/10/2013 06:09PM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 321 rocknut 01/10/2013 06:34PM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 220 daveydaveydavo 01/11/2013 12:42AM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 161 the ORIGINAL brent 01/11/2013 01:21PM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 282 Scott Watson 01/10/2013 07:48PM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 268 Scott 01/10/2013 08:49PM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 233 Peter M. Bietenholz 01/10/2013 09:13PM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 221 Burg 01/10/2013 10:02PM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 223 Laurent 01/10/2013 10:10PM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 227 the ORIGINAL brent 01/10/2013 10:15PM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 216 Walk In The Shadows 01/11/2013 12:42AM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 187 Laurent 01/11/2013 01:19AM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 209 rocknut 01/10/2013 11:33PM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 191 gary191265 01/10/2013 11:46PM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 173 Laurent 01/11/2013 01:17AM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 168 rocknut 01/11/2013 01:37AM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 192 Scott 01/11/2013 12:09AM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 197 gary191265 01/10/2013 11:16PM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 186 kaneudeck 01/10/2013 11:58PM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 177 Rockingbear 01/11/2013 04:18AM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 146 Carl1 01/11/2013 05:06AM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 169 rocknut 01/11/2013 05:29AM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 161 Carl1 01/11/2013 06:06AM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 125 rocknut 01/11/2013 06:16AM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 142 Steve_Roamer 01/11/2013 08:15AM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 153 rocknut 01/11/2013 09:00AM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 156 Troy 01/11/2013 09:21AM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 145 Ydde 01/11/2013 05:49PM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 134 Troy 01/11/2013 09:17AM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful?145 Signal Fan 01/11/2013 12:25PM
Re: Rough Cutt - were they too "different" to be hugely successful? 125 rocknut 01/11/2013 05:54PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Powered by Phorum.

Disclaimer: melodicrock.com takes no responsibility for the contents of messages posted on this open forum, or for the sanity of those posting.