Re: Hinder (again)
Posted by:
DirtyPennyIowa
()
Date: December 04, 2012 05:51PM
First listen, I was like.. WTF is this pop garbage. Where is the rock?
After a few spins this past weekend, I would say it's an ok album. It doesn't suck, but it is definitely too TOP 40 sounding for my tastes.
-- Keep Rockin
After a few spins this past weekend, I would say it's an ok album. It doesn't suck, but it is definitely too TOP 40 sounding for my tastes.
-- Keep Rockin
| Subject | Views | Written By | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
Hinder (again)
| 361 | Peter M. Bietenholz | 12/02/2012 09:53AM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 235 | rocknut | 12/02/2012 10:08AM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 201 | Peter M. Bietenholz | 12/02/2012 10:25AM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 185 | rocknut | 12/02/2012 11:34AM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 179 | Coco | 12/02/2012 10:58AM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 128 | Robert | 12/02/2012 06:20PM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 124 | Coco | 12/02/2012 06:57PM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 49 | rarock | 12/06/2012 12:09PM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 118 | MIKE | 12/03/2012 08:17AM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 114 | Gill | 12/03/2012 10:59AM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 80 | VanPersy | 12/04/2012 05:27AM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 72 | Peter M. Bietenholz | 12/04/2012 08:26AM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 77 | TumeniNotes | 12/04/2012 02:53PM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 90 | rocknut | 12/04/2012 03:24PM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 76 | MIKE | 12/04/2012 03:44PM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 79 | Robert | 12/04/2012 04:12PM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 87 | Coco | 12/04/2012 04:53PM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 87 | MIKE | 12/04/2012 04:48PM |
|
Re: Hinder (again)
| 76 | Coco | 12/04/2012 04:54PM |
|
Re: Hinder (again) | 68 | DirtyPennyIowa | 12/04/2012 05:51PM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.