Re: Was Grunge really necessary?
Posted by: RAB ()
Date: February 15, 2012 10:23PM

I'm not one that subscribes to the idea that it was Grunge that was solely responsible for making the 80s hard rock obsolete.

In August 87 Appetite for Destruction came out & GNR was portrayed as the band that would rid the world of the pretty boy poser nonsense. To most of the people I knew at the time, this meant that the likes of Winger, Nelson, Warrant etc. that followed in the next 18 months were anachronisms, albeit ones that still sold massively in the US for a period.

The fresh new music was Jane's Addiction, Kings X, Faith No More, Fishbone, Warrior Soul etc. They all had a mixture of styles & lyrical maturity that was lacking with those bands that eventually became labelled Hair Bands. And don't forget the impact of Metallica etc.

When the press started using the term Grunge it related to Mudhoney, Tad, the Melvins etc. The name fit those bands but by purely geographical coincidence the likes of Mother Love Bone were placed in the same category & from there it seemed to be applied to the rest of the Seattle scene when none of the bigger bands sounded alike.

The grunge bands really were hard rock bands that could cross genres and be embraced by both metal fans AND alternative fans but so were the likes of the Chili Peppers, Nine Inch Nails etc.
In my opinion it would have still happened without Nirvana & Pearl Jam.

Navigate: Previous MessageNext Message
Options: ReplyQuote


SubjectViewsWritten ByPosted
Was Grunge really necessary? 838 RAMSAY 02/15/2012 07:42PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 645 Andrew 02/15/2012 07:50PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 563 rocknut 02/15/2012 07:57PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 478 RAMSAY 02/15/2012 08:09PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 618 rocknut 02/15/2012 08:14PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 545 Andrew 02/15/2012 08:18PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 461 rocknut 02/15/2012 08:41PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 233 Scott Watson 02/16/2012 08:13PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 489 Andrew 02/15/2012 08:16PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 435 rocknut 02/15/2012 08:37PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 436 Andrew 02/15/2012 08:40PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 376 rocknut 02/15/2012 08:49PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 397 the ORIGINAL brent 02/15/2012 09:04PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 332 rocknut 02/15/2012 09:09PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 331 the ORIGINAL brent 02/15/2012 09:43PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 342 rocknut 02/15/2012 10:18PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 284 stryper 02/16/2012 03:20AM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 270 rocknut 02/16/2012 03:27AM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 240 stryper 02/16/2012 08:51PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 387 Andrew 02/15/2012 09:20PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 303 Walk In The Shadows 02/16/2012 12:27AM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 200 Scott Watson 02/16/2012 08:15PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 253 Terry K. 02/16/2012 05:56AM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 157 Vantheman 02/17/2012 09:40AM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 193 Terry K. 02/17/2012 12:22PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 175 rocknut 02/18/2012 08:11PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 172 Terry K. 02/19/2012 12:50AM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 338 Scott Watson 02/15/2012 08:07PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 346 MetroGnome 02/15/2012 08:41PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 309 the ORIGINAL brent 02/15/2012 08:47PM
Fans my age were lucky.... 360 rocknut 02/15/2012 08:54PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 374 Andrew 02/15/2012 09:00PM
No. 316 jamesrock 02/15/2012 09:08PM
Re: No. 347 rocknut 02/15/2012 09:13PM
Re: No. 260 jamesrock 02/16/2012 02:56AM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 244 Terry K. 02/16/2012 01:21PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 311 Shade 02/15/2012 09:55PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary?369 RAB 02/15/2012 10:23PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 303 rocknut 02/15/2012 10:34PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 296 MetroGnome 02/15/2012 11:09PM
Butch Walker certainly seems to think so 388 Benno 02/15/2012 11:27PM
Re: Butch Walker certainly seems to think so 339 Skinkie 02/15/2012 11:59PM
Re: Butch Walker certainly seems to think so 316 rocknut 02/16/2012 12:26AM
Mustaine 199 Benno 02/16/2012 03:12PM
Re: Butch Walker certainly seems to think so 330 Coco 02/16/2012 01:45AM
Re: Butch Walker certainly seems to think so 323 forestred 02/16/2012 01:45AM
Re: Butch Walker certainly seems to think so 304 Coco 02/16/2012 01:48AM
Re: Butch Walker certainly seems to think so 350 Robert 02/16/2012 01:55AM
Re: Butch Walker certainly seems to think so 275 forestred 02/16/2012 05:22AM
Re: Butch Walker certainly seems to think so 268 Coco 02/16/2012 05:47AM
Re: Butch Walker certainly seems to think so 197 Nunzio Soprano 02/16/2012 05:46PM
Re: Butch Walker certainly seems to think so 212 Rebelson 02/16/2012 09:40PM
Butch's Book 126 Kauna 02/19/2012 06:12AM
Re: Butch's Book 143 rocknut 02/19/2012 09:02PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 301 OzzMosiz 02/16/2012 12:46AM
Re: Was THIS POST really necessary? 309 TedSheckler 02/16/2012 01:14AM
Re: Was THIS POST really necessary? 283 Walk In The Shadows 02/16/2012 01:32AM
Re: Was THIS POST really necessary? 289 RAMSAY 02/16/2012 02:40AM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 295 Robert 02/16/2012 02:01AM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 260 cymru 02/16/2012 03:42AM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 235 kaneudeck 02/16/2012 04:04AM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 283 AndyC 02/16/2012 05:45AM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 215 matt 02/16/2012 09:23AM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 180 kaneudeck 02/17/2012 01:20AM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 210 Leppard 02/16/2012 11:16AM
For What? 233 Joe-× 02/16/2012 11:45AM
Re: For What? 205 Julian H 02/16/2012 12:15PM
Re: For What? 217 Terry K. 02/16/2012 01:33PM
Re: For What? 221 joe 02/17/2012 12:38AM
Re: For What? 201 Terry K. 02/17/2012 05:29AM
Re: For What? 183 joe 02/17/2012 07:01AM
Re: For What? 156 Terry K. 02/17/2012 09:23AM
Re: For What? 182 rocknut 02/18/2012 08:14PM
Re: For What? 196 stryper 02/17/2012 01:13AM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 213 MCFCTrick 02/16/2012 07:07PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 282 2littleangels 02/16/2012 07:44PM
Re: Was Grunge really necessary? 211 HoodryWoodry 02/17/2012 06:17AM
in a word, yes 179 TedSheckler 02/17/2012 07:02AM
Re: in a word, yes 176 Terry K. 02/17/2012 09:24AM
Re: in a word, yes 166 rocknut 02/18/2012 08:15PM
Re: in a word, yes 134 Terry K. 02/19/2012 12:51AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Powered by Phorum.

Disclaimer: melodicrock.com takes no responsibility for the contents of messages posted on this open forum, or for the sanity of those posting.