RE: koogles and I are dellusional.
Date: November 22, 2000 04:39PM
For the record, "my music" includes Queen, Rush, Kansas, Styx, Boston, Steely Dan, Van Halen, etc (The environment in the music industry that existed in the 70s that allowed these bands to blossom is long dead. I could hope for its return but I would be delussion to expect it.)
We just gotta live with the fact that there is very little diversity in major label acts today. As far as modern/alternative rock goes, most bands are complete sh*t. Fortunately for us there are some "modern" rock bands which are more classic than modern. Bands like Collective Soul, Goo Goo Dolls, SR-71, Tsar, etc would have made it big both in the 70s and 80s.
I can not speak for everyone else but the bands we are mentioning here are the exception and not the rule in the modern/alternative genre. These "diamond in the ruff" bands deserve our support (or at least our attention), in spite of the crowd they get lumped into.
You are right to recognize that these modern bands do not play the 1998 version of melodic rock. But you are wrong to think that "we" all come here to relive 1988.
BD
|
SR-71
| 73 |
Don
| 11/20/2000 09:14PM |
RE: SR-71
| 32 |
Kevin
| 11/20/2000 10:04PM |
The 'New Breed' keeps on rolling
| 47 | Surfpunk | 11/21/2000 03:39PM |
RE: The revolution
| 44 |
Don
| 11/21/2000 06:19PM |
RE: The revolution? Hardly!
| 54 |
koogles
| 11/21/2000 07:24PM |
koogles, you are dellusional.
| 59 |
Copious K9
| 11/21/2000 08:29PM |
RE: koogles, you are dellusional.
| 53 |
koogles
| 11/22/2000 01:15PM |
RE: koogles and I are dellusional. | 34 |
Copious K9
| 11/22/2000 04:39PM |
Koogles, Have you not noticed...
| 53 | Surfpunk | 11/21/2000 08:40PM |
RE: Koogles, Have you not noticed...
| 48 |
koogles
| 11/22/2000 12:59PM |
Koogles, in response to some of your comments...
| 41 |
Don
| 11/22/2000 11:36PM |
RE: Koogles, in response to some of your comments.
| 48 |
koogles
| 11/23/2000 02:10AM |
RE: Let me get this straight...
| 48 |
Don
| 11/23/2000 04:41AM |
RE: Let me get this straight...
| 53 |
koogles
| 11/23/2000 11:36AM |
RE: Koogles, in response to some of your comments.
| 39 |
sfk kurt
| 11/24/2000 11:16AM |
RE: Koogles, in a sense it all boils down to...
| 49 |
Don
| 11/21/2000 08:51PM |
RE: Koogles, I just noticed...
| 46 |
Don
| 11/21/2000 09:03PM |
A few words for the lukewarm
| 37 |
koogles
| 11/22/2000 12:41PM |
RE: Hi Hot Stuff!! ...It's me, Luke Warm
| 41 |
Don
| 11/23/2000 12:15AM |
RE: Hi Hot Stuff!! ...It's me, Luke Warm
| 49 |
koogles
| 11/23/2000 01:59AM |
RE: Hi Hot Stuff!! ...It's me, Luke Warm
| 44 |
Don
| 11/23/2000 04:46AM |
RE: Hi Hot Stuff!! ...It's me, Luke Warm
| 46 |
koogles
| 11/23/2000 11:26AM |
RE: One last thought...
| 41 |
Don
| 11/23/2000 12:03PM |
RE: DON???
| 51 | -Rob | 11/21/2000 09:51PM |
RE: Hi Rob!!
| 48 |
Don
| 11/21/2000 10:07PM |
Treble Charger
| 47 |
Tom Krupa
| 11/22/2000 12:39PM |
RE: SR-71 - One more comment on their sound...
| 51 |
Don
| 11/21/2000 09:12PM |
RE: SR-71 - One more comment on their sound...
| 46 |
Copious K9
| 11/22/2000 12:32PM |
RE: SR-71 - One more comment on their sound...
| 53 |
Matt
| 11/22/2000 01:46PM |