well i read ur thread about u2 and he isnt saying "u2 is heavy" per se what he is saying, i think, is that they have more songs on previous cds that are heavier than the new stuff. meaning more softer stuff vs rocking stuff on u2 standards. he isnt saying u2 is like wasp or something like that just that u2 use to make more rockers than they do now. but rockers on u2 standards not hard rock in general. i hope this makes sence.
mike