Hey Surfpunk.....
Posted by: Mark Ashton ()
Date: August 20, 2000 11:05PM

Why the false name to hide the fact that you don`t want to post under your original false name?

You say "You could start by plugging John Halliwell in for a change and by not faking the backing vocals!!"

What a pointless criticism that is. For one, John Halliwell IS plugged in and singing live. TEN simply choose to mix the live vocals with some from backing tapes because it is physically impossible to recreate the vocals from their albums without doing this and they want to give the fans as close a sound to the album as possible. Are you honestly suggesting that this makes them less of a live band? If so, then what are / were QUEENSRYCHE, RUSH, FM, DARE, EUROPE, DEF LEPPARD, QUEEN etc, etc?

You also say "Oh yeah, and when you 'produce' your sales figures don't forget to compare the UK sales against the other territories so we can all see just exactly where this genre is alive and where it is dead."

Well, the initial shipment of "Babylon" in Europe is going to be around 25,000 copies, with 2,500 in the UK. We expect to reach around 4,000 sales in the UK in the end.
Let`s see if any other bands in this genre are sellingg anything like that amount in the UK. I seriously doubt it, so where the "missed the boat" nonsense that someone posted earlier comes from I really don`t know.
Isn`t it about time that the internet was used for something positive rather than a bunch of anoraks slagging off something because it doesn`t sound like `their` particular pet like.

This site is in existence because of Andrew`s love of Melodic Rock. As such the site is all about that particular genre. I`m pretty sure that his intention is for that genre of music to be promoted in a positive fashion. I`m not saying that evreyone should blindly buy and love every album within the genre, of course that would be useless as well. But, why do a select few, such as ingo and gav post so irregularly and when they do it is negative. I wouldn`t mind but their criticisms are so wildly inaccurate and juvenile that they must be the work of pretty slow minds. To say that TEN have missed the boat when they are clearly the most sucessful band on any of the indies and to say that you want `real` bands like STEELHOUSE LANE, who are clearly a studio project with no more originality than TEN anyway. Please don`t tell me that the opening track on their album is anything other than a blatant steal from half a dozen different GIANT songs. By the way, I love the band, but to say they are doing anything other than rehashing old ideas is plain silly.

And also, as my partner Bruce rightly states, before anyone comes on here saying that I or he shouldn`t come up here and get involved, that is bullshit. I`m as big a fan as anyone else, more so than most, so I have a right to say what I think. I also have a vested interest. If I came into anyone else`s place of work and slagged them off inaccurately ( even if it was MY opinion ) then they would be well within their rights to defend themselves. As such, it is within my rights to defend myself. It is also because both myself and Bruce care so much about what we are doing that we DO get involved in these arguments.

Bye for now,
Mark



















Navigate: Previous MessageNext Message
Options: ReplyQuote


SubjectViewsWritten ByPosted
Ten Babylon 120 Kev 08/19/2000 11:08PM
RE: Ten Babylon 91 Andrew 08/20/2000 12:02AM
RE: Ten Babylon 96 Ingo 08/20/2000 05:07AM
RE: Ten Babylon 92Gav08/20/2000 11:16AM
RE: Ten Babylon 74 Andrew 08/20/2000 11:31AM
RE: Ten Babylon 104 Kevin 08/20/2000 02:42PM
RE: Ten Babylon 93 Kieran 08/20/2000 11:47AM
RE: Ten Babylon 97blm08/20/2000 07:50PM
RE: Ten Babylon 77 Kev 08/20/2000 09:57PM
RE: Ten Babylon 87blm08/20/2000 10:23PM
RE: Ten Babylon 90 DJ Klaus 08/21/2000 07:18PM
RE: Ten Babylon 84The Reaper08/20/2000 10:16PM
RE: Ten Babylon 91blm08/20/2000 10:59PM
Hey Surfpunk.....103Mark Ashton08/20/2000 11:05PM
RE: Hey Surfpunk..... 95Surfpunk08/21/2000 03:57AM
RE: Ten Babylon 85 Kev 08/20/2000 09:50PM
RE: Ten Babylon 105Stevo08/21/2000 04:24AM
RE: Ten Babylon 74blm08/21/2000 04:42AM
RE: Ten Babylon 93Tony M08/21/2000 07:21AM
RE: Ten Babylon 88blm08/21/2000 02:57PM
RE: Ten Babylon 84Gav08/21/2000 04:41PM
RE: Ten Babylon 100Pete08/21/2000 05:12PM
RE: Ten Babylon 72blm08/21/2000 06:25PM
RE: Ten Babylon 97Pete08/21/2000 10:15PM
RE: Ten Babylon 81blm08/21/2000 08:59PM
ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!! 83Surfpunk08/22/2000 03:17AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Powered by Phorum.

Disclaimer: melodicrock.com takes no responsibility for the contents of messages posted on this open forum, or for the sanity of those posting.