Down with John Q!
Posted by: Surfpunk ()
Date: August 03, 2000 04:48AM

Totally agree with everything John Q had to say. For the record though I have to say that, although the AOR/MHR content is fairly low, CLASSIC ROCK is definately the brightest hope this sort of music has had for a long time. The fact that it does not just aim to preach to the already converted like HARD ROXX, THE ROCK etc. did, but instead targets a mainstream readership and then says 'well if you like this, there's a whole scene going on that you probably don't know about', is the key to its success.

Of course I'd love to see more articles on MHR in there but the point is that this magazine is in the perfect position to do just that when/if that one band breaks. For now I wouldn't change it one bit. Having said that maybe Dave Reynolds could vouch for its independence in the reviewing field.

Dave?



SubjectViewsWritten ByPosted
I'd like other's people's opinions on this post 177BLM08/02/2000 08:59AM
RE: My opinion 146John Q08/02/2000 12:18PM
Stop, you're getting me all depressed...;-( 129Peter M. Bietenholz08/02/2000 10:04PM
RE: Stop 173John Q08/03/2000 07:05AM
RE: Stop 128Dave08/03/2000 07:19AM
Futureal 149Surfpunk08/03/2000 08:10AM
3 Doors Down 118EVE608/04/2000 12:37AM
HOUSE OF LORDS 114Mark Ashton08/04/2000 08:00PM
RE: HOUSE OF LORDS 141John Q08/05/2000 02:59PM
The "Empires" cd fiasco.... 118 Kevin 08/06/2000 04:27PM
RE: My opinion 117 ChrisD 08/02/2000 10:45PM
RE: My opinion 136Dave08/03/2000 01:14AM
RE: My opinion 152John Q08/03/2000 06:39AM
contradictory post award 112Pete08/03/2000 12:51AM
RE: contradictory post award..ooops 113Pete08/03/2000 01:25AM
Down with John Q!113Surfpunk08/03/2000 04:48AM
Classic Rock magazine 136Steve, Denmark08/06/2000 11:47PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Powered by Phorum.

Disclaimer: melodicrock.com takes no responsibility for the contents of messages posted on this open forum, or for the sanity of those posting.