Re: Portrait failed because...
Posted by: Mrpool ()
Date: April 19, 2001 01:03AM

I think they may have had the wrong person running it? The right person would have creatively marketed the bands & gotten the word out about their new cds. Hell, you hardly even knew when a new cd came out from some of the Portrait label bands. The Portrait website was half-assed & was rarely up-to-date.

I appreciated the intent of the Portrait label though, & hope we'll see another label successfully support this type of music in the future.

Navigate: Previous MessageNext Message
Options: ReplyQuote

SubjectViewsWritten ByPosted
Portrait failed because... 134Eric Abrahamsen04/18/2001 08:16PM
Re: Portrait failed because... 85 Marc Vanway 04/18/2001 09:06PM
Re: Portrait not officially failed... 101 Andrew 04/18/2001 09:44PM
Re: Portrait not officially failed... 93Eric Abrahamsen04/19/2001 04:07AM
Re: Portrait failed because...110Mrpool04/19/2001 01:03AM
Re: Portrait failed because... 99 J.C. 04/19/2001 01:51AM
Re: Portrait failed because... 120John Q04/19/2001 04:10AM
Not for the lack of new bands it didn't! 96Surfpunk04/19/2001 03:30AM
Re: Not for the lack of new bands it didn't! 94 sfk kurt 04/19/2001 09:34PM
Re: Portrait failed because... 94Bighairnolonger04/19/2001 04:27AM
Re: Portrait failed because... 114Eric Abrahamsen04/19/2001 07:26AM
Re: Portrait failed because... 79Bighairnolonger04/20/2001 04:14AM
Current state of rock. 98Surfpunk04/20/2001 07:31AM
Re: Current state of rock. 106Bighairnolonger04/20/2001 09:36AM
The biggest mistake of Kalodner 104 Marc Vanway 04/19/2001 07:22PM
Re: The biggest mistake of Kalodner 104 Mario 04/20/2001 03:25AM

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Powered by Phorum.

Disclaimer: takes no responsibility for the contents of messages posted on this open forum, or for the sanity of those posting.