Looking back to earlier the Blotzer court issues...wasn't it established that the people who owned the Ratt name were Blotzer & DiMartini? (Blotzer claimed that, somehow, DiMartini lost his share by neglecting meetings or something)

So, how did they kick DiMartini out of the band? Does this mean DiMartini is till profiting from this & approves of it? Aren't the current "classic/original" members (Pearcy & Croucier) not owners of the brand? Is Blotzer still profiting, too, or did they force him out of it all, last year?