<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Photo Scanners</title>
<description> Anyone use those photo feed scanners like Kodak or Pandigital? I am reading you can do like 50-100 photos then you need to clean it but the digital images are fine. Wanted feedback from people here as opposed to unknowns on the net.</description><link>http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,929324,929324#msg-929324</link><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 10:14:16 +1000</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Phorum 5.2.16</generator>
<item>
<guid>http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,929324,929411#msg-929411</guid>
<title>Re: Photo Scanners</title><link>http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,929324,929411#msg-929411</link><description><![CDATA[ I've got this...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/product-reviews/B001TTLM6W/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&amp;showViewpoints=1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Canon Scanner</a><br /><br />Does the job, was cheap as chips and rarely gets used !]]></description>
<dc:creator>gary191265</dc:creator>
<category>Noticeboard</category><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 03:17:29 +1100</pubDate></item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,929324,929324#msg-929324</guid>
<title>Photo Scanners</title><link>http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,929324,929324#msg-929324</link><description><![CDATA[ Anyone use those photo feed scanners like Kodak or Pandigital? I am reading you can do like 50-100 photos then you need to clean it but the digital images are fine. Wanted feedback from people here as opposed to unknowns on the net.]]></description>
<dc:creator>Snake65</dc:creator>
<category>Noticeboard</category><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 11:34:02 +1100</pubDate></item>
</channel>
</rss>