at the risk of starting yet another huge reviews debate (which I'm sure is exactly what this will do) from the review.... "it is filled with some killer songs and the upgraded performances and sound make it a brilliant album for those that will come in to the material from a fresh perspective. And it has that more dominant guitar driven sound we are all craving from Dare." Original album score back in the archives: 94% re-done album score (presuming you didn't have the original): 90% So, if it's better than the original (which the review seems to indicate), how did it get a lower score than the first time around? Obviously, impressions and personal tastes can change over the years--is that what happened here? Just curious... Kevinhttp://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914396#msg-914396Fri, 24 May 2013 14:26:58 +1000 Phorum 5.2.16 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914524#msg-914524 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914524#msg-914524
95/75]]> Andrew NoticeboardMon, 08 Oct 2012 10:51:57 +1100 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914502#msg-914502 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914502#msg-914502 Alex NoticeboardMon, 08 Oct 2012 05:12:03 +1100 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914490#msg-914490 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914490#msg-914490I can understand why rating would be lower now.]]> 2112 NoticeboardMon, 08 Oct 2012 02:12:25 +1100 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914461#msg-914461 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914461#msg-914461 rocknut NoticeboardSun, 07 Oct 2012 20:59:47 +1100 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914458#msg-914458 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914458#msg-914458

Figge]]> Figge NoticeboardSun, 07 Oct 2012 20:32:59 +1100 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914451#msg-914451 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914451#msg-914451 jamesrock NoticeboardSun, 07 Oct 2012 18:04:09 +1100 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914449#msg-914449 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914449#msg-914449 Andrew NoticeboardSun, 07 Oct 2012 17:52:53 +1100 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914447#msg-914447 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914447#msg-914447 Benno NoticeboardSun, 07 Oct 2012 17:20:59 +1100 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914432#msg-914432 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914432#msg-914432So yeah, that's a bit of an error there. I think it's only fair to change that.

It's the Internet, so I can fix these things. I'll take a look later.]]> Andrew NoticeboardSun, 07 Oct 2012 10:51:22 +1100 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914396#msg-914396 http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,914396,914396#msg-914396exactly what this will do)

from the review....
"it is filled with some killer songs and the upgraded performances and sound make it a brilliant album for those that will come in to the material from a fresh perspective. And it has that more dominant guitar driven sound we are all craving from Dare."

Original album score back in the archives: 94%
re-done album score (presuming you didn't have the original): 90%

So, if it's better than the original (which the review seems to indicate), how did it get a lower score than the first time around? Obviously, impressions and personal tastes can change over the years--is that what happened here? Just curious...
Kevin]]> Kevin NoticeboardSun, 07 Oct 2012 04:37:57 +1100