<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>New Glenn Hughes - opinions?</title>
<description> I haven't listened to it more than a couple of times yet, but somehow it does not grab me like pretty everything from 'From Now On...' to 'Incense &amp;amp; Peaches' did. I don't even feel like playing it over and over like I did with 'The Way It Is', which rocked my world and still does.

Sure, the vocals are great, but there seems to be something missing. Maybe it's the fact that Glenn pretty much admitted he was done with the heavy rock thing and wants to go full on R&amp;amp;B or whatever now. That would explain why this whole thing sounds like he going through the motions... 

The first song on R.O.C.K. is probably the heaviest thing he's ever done, heavier than the 'Addiction' stuff even - why would he even record a song like that given his preference for lighter stuff? The Iommi tune is kind of weak, certainly nothing special compared to what's on 'Seventh Star'. I dunno, maybe this one will just take longer to sink in, but so far I'm slightly disappointed with R.O.C.K. Hmmm...</description><link>http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,2343,2343#msg-2343</link><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 04:33:30 +1000</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Phorum 5.2.16</generator>
<item>
<guid>http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,2343,2497#msg-2497</guid>
<title>RE: Not happy!</title><link>http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,2343,2497#msg-2497</link><description><![CDATA[ Hmmmmm!<br />I think you were probably right! Once again Glenn fails to live up to his potential.<br />Incredible singer but he needs a really good writing partner AND perhaps even another singer to trade off! He was WAY better than Coverdale but the combination worked so maybe he should ease off on the ego and give it a go.<br /><br />There's a few other vocalists who could do well to adopt this approach too.]]></description>
<dc:creator>Surfpunk</dc:creator>
<category>Noticeboard</category><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2000 08:51:24 +1000</pubDate></item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,2343,2374#msg-2374</guid>
<title>RE: Not happy!</title><link>http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,2343,2374#msg-2374</link><description><![CDATA[ Still waiting for the bastard thing to turn up in store at the moment due to 'distribution problems by the label' in the UK...allegedly! But I'm still looking forward to making my own mind up about it. No offence guys but I've let myself be put off some storming albums because of reviews by other people who just don't get it. But if it stinks I'll let you know!]]></description>
<dc:creator>Surfpunk</dc:creator>
<category>Noticeboard</category><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2000 08:24:57 +1000</pubDate></item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,2343,2352#msg-2352</guid>
<title>RE: Not happy!</title><link>http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,2343,2352#msg-2352</link><description><![CDATA[ I could not agree more! And to makes things worse, the press release that came with my copy, used Hughes' contributions to Whitesnake's &quot;Slip of the Tongue&quot; as a selling point- and how important were his contributions?-and yet proceeds to have a niggle or two at David Coverdale a paragraph or two later.<br />So, either Hughes is a hypocrite of the first order, or he has no control over the way his PR company conducts business.<br /><br />Andrew wrote:<br />-------------------------------<br />Dude,<br />I love Glenn Hughes to death, but this album will possibly rank last amongst my collection.<br />It's still got some fine moments and rocks big time in places, but there is really no atmosphere to the music nor any high points in the songs...no choruses...<br /><br />Full review this weekend.<br /><br />Regards,<br />Andrew. ]]></description>
<dc:creator>Andrew Paul</dc:creator>
<category>Noticeboard</category><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2000 20:45:18 +1000</pubDate></item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,2343,2344#msg-2344</guid>
<title>Not happy!</title><link>http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,2343,2344#msg-2344</link><description><![CDATA[ Dude,<br />I love Glenn Hughes to death, but this album will possibly rank last amongst my collection.<br />It's still got some fine moments and rocks big time in places, but there is really no atmosphere to the music nor any high points in the songs...no choruses...<br /><br />Full review this weekend.<br /><br />Regards,<br />Andrew. ]]></description>
<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
<category>Noticeboard</category><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2000 18:30:58 +1000</pubDate></item>
<item>
<guid>http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,2343,2343#msg-2343</guid>
<title>New Glenn Hughes - opinions?</title><link>http://www.melodicrock.com/phorum52/read.php?1,2343,2343#msg-2343</link><description><![CDATA[ I haven't listened to it more than a couple of times yet, but somehow it does not grab me like pretty everything from 'From Now On...' to 'Incense &amp; Peaches' did. I don't even feel like playing it over and over like I did with 'The Way It Is', which rocked my world and still does.<br /><br />Sure, the vocals are great, but there seems to be something missing. Maybe it's the fact that Glenn pretty much admitted he was done with the heavy rock thing and wants to go full on R&amp;B or whatever now. That would explain why this whole thing sounds like he going through the motions...<br /><br />The first song on R.O.C.K. is probably the heaviest thing he's ever done, heavier than the 'Addiction' stuff even - why would he even record a song like that given his preference for lighter stuff? The Iommi tune is kind of weak, certainly nothing special compared to what's on 'Seventh Star'. I dunno, maybe this one will just take longer to sink in, but so far I'm slightly disappointed with R.O.C.K. Hmmm...]]></description>
<dc:creator>John Q</dc:creator>
<category>Noticeboard</category><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2000 17:46:03 +1000</pubDate></item>
</channel>
</rss>